Author: Brent Hermansen

Most people would agree that one test score does not declare the success of a physician, but for medical graduates applying for residency, it can mean a successful Match. The average number of residency applications per applicant has increased from 79 to 91, and according to the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), residency programs may receive 1,000 applications for only a handful of residency slots. They have to sift through these candidates somehow, so test scores receive an elevated importance.

Sifting Through Scores

Instead of looking at each candidate as a whole, residency programs cull program applicants by eliminating those with low test scores and only considering those with scores well above passing. The result is that quality applicants may be removed from applicant pools based on a number instead of more important skills that can be understood through experience and in-person interviews.

A Necessary Evil

This year, the Invitational Conference on USMLE Scoring (InCUS) convened and discussed ways to improve the USMLE. One of the recommendations they created was to make USMLE Step 1 pass/fail. Another idea was further examination of the reliability of USMLE scores in predicting residency success. Lastly, the conference sought to find ways to address racial disparities in test scores, as white students statistically have higher test scores than any other demographic.

Ultimately, there was no solution that eliminated the value of a real test score. In order to handle the number of applications, program directors have to eliminate candidates by some quantifiable measurement regardless of talented physicians who score poorly on the USMLE exam.

Negative Impacts of USMLE Now

There are other negative impacts of the USMLE besides removing otherwise talented physicians from applicant pools. The biggest one is mental health. USMLE test takers suffer insurmountable stress because of the importance placed on test scores during the Match process. If you are currently getting ready for the Match, you have already suffered this predicament. The score predicts your future success, and placing that importance on ONE TEST creates a level of stress that is difficult to pile on the stress of the Match process and the future of a medical career.

This is the type of stress that causes medical students, residents, and physicians to burnout, which is why there are efforts to change the test to possibly pass-fail or something that would reduce mental health issues and increase equitable acceptance into residency programs.

Accepting the Way It Is…For Now

Right now, medical students don’t have a choice when it comes to the importance placed on USMLE scores. If you score poorly, you can retake the test up to six times. This may not reduce stress, and it takes time to wait for another test to be available, but at least one bad test score does not have to equate to the end of your medical endeavors.

The only other thing you can do is make sure that a lackluster score on the USMLE test is met with exemplary training, volunteer experiences, and excellent interviewing skills. If your scores qualify you to get into a program, you’re going to have to shine the get an interview. A little pre-planning by volunteering or being an intern at locations that are top picks for your residency applications can also help you to stand out above the rest.

Especially for FMGs, USMLE scores are very important because FMGs are considered a little bit of an unknown due to different education systems. The Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) has done its best to ensure that only quality medical graduates are accepted by U.S. medical residencies, but it is not infallible. Program directors may have biases against foreign applicants, so high USMLE scores ensure that you won’t be automatically dismissed for a U.S. medical graduate who has known medical training.

Preserving Mental Health

Hopefully, the future of USMLE testing will result in the best applicants being accepted for quality residency programs and promoting the best results for the healthcare system. Until then, we work with what we’ve got, which means USMLE scores are very important.

USMLE Step 1 and 2 should be completed before applying for residency programs through the Match. If you want to shine a little more, consider taking step 3 as soon as possible. This will give further confidence to residency program directors that you’re a good fit for their program.

Other than that, you can preserve your mental health with proper diet, exercise, and sleep regulation to ensure that your body and mind are in as good of shape as possible to handle the demands of the exams.

It May be Misguided, But it is Important

Suggesting that the USMLE exams should be pass/fail does not diminish the importance of these exams. The ability to pass this three-step test does determine to a certain extent whether or not you have learned the skills required to practice medicine competently in the United States. Until the format is changed to one that more accurately represents medical knowledge and skill, your score will remain an important part of the Match process.

Having a certain attitude about a group of people grounded on assumptions and preconceived notions of reality based in fiction has a negative impact on the quality of care given by medical professionals. Foreign Medical Graduates (FMGs) are very familiar with receiving prejudice. They face it during their residency match, during training, and by patients and colleagues. They are criticized because they are unknown, and these prejudices affect their medical training experience. However, FMGs are not immune to having their own prejudices. Each physician, no matter where he or she went to medical school, must make a concerted effort to avoid common prejudices toward patients. In this way, you can ensure you are giving equitable care to all human beings.

6 Prejudices All Medical Graduates Must Avoid

1. Weight Prejudice

An August 2019 article from Medical News Today notes that physicians may be prone to unfairly judging patients based on their weight. It told of a study where medical students used obesity simulation suits to appear like a diabetic patient with a body mass index of over 30. Researchers performed an Anti-Fat Attitudes Test (AFAT) to measure prejudice. The test was a 5-point Likert scale to rate statements about obesity. The statements blamed people for being fat, denied genetic variables, and linked obesity to laziness. Students reported that the suit enabled normal stereotyping of obese individuals. Females were stereotyped more than males, and previous research has shown that these attitudes make physicians less likely to pursue alternative treatments to weight loss. This could greatly reduce efficacy of treatments for obesity where depression or other health conditions were the root causes of obesity.

2. Sexuality Prejudice

According to Flórez-Salamanca et al., there are negative health outcomes for homosexual people due to feelings of discomfort, communication problems, and the inability to develop a positive alliance between a provider and patient (2014). These authors also pointed out that homosexual people received unequal and lesser quality care. They recommend identifying these prejudices as a first step in eliminating them. Logically, it can be assumed that this would apply to all non-heterosexual preferences.

3. Age Prejudice

Geriatric medical practice comes with its own set of challenges, and the elderly may have multiple morbidities that require complex treatment in an environment of poor understanding and compliance. However, not every elderly person has the same level of ailments, and those in the community may function as well as young adults. In either case, it is important to have compassion for those suffering from cognitive decline while also acknowledging that age does not automatically equate to cognitive decline. One of the very apparent results of this is under-treatment of geriatric patients because of an acceptance that their decline is inescapable.

4. Cultural Prejudice

Foreign medical graduates come from different cultures and may face cultural prejudices every day, but they cannot extend those to their patients without risk of compromising care. The goals of medical outcomes for people from different cultures may differ from patient to patient, and this must be acknowledged by physicians in order for those outcomes to be positive. Additionally, the customs and etiquette of different cultures must be understood in order to properly communicate and come to a treatment that will be effective and the patient will understand.

5. Education Prejudice

Education prejudice may cause a physician to dumb down language to a level that is insulting to a well-read patient. It may also be insulting to use elevated language in a way that offends the person with lesser vocabulary. Both of these situations can be frustrating and cause prejudice. A physician may feel that a person will not be inclined to comply with treatment if they view them as “lazy enough” or “dumb enough” to have not pursued education. Instead, physicians should try to see all people in a manner that requires “effective” communication instead of viewing it as substandard or elevated.

6. Poverty Prejudice

Lastly, medical graduates may feel prejudice toward people who come from impoverished backgrounds, and they may not elevate treatment options like they would for a patient with private insurance who seems affluent. Sometimes, these treatment options need to be removed from the table since insurance nor the patient may be able to cover them, but they should still be considered as options until financial barriers are confirmed by the patient. Patients with less resources are no less worthy of care, and physicians must make sure they do not practice medicine with this prejudice clouding their judgement.

Prejudice Isn’t Always Known

Many physicians get involved in medicine simply because they want to help people, and these altruistic purposes do not coincide with prejudice. However, prejudice may be unknown and stem from environments where one was raised or exposures one has had to particular communities. The first step in eliminating their impact on medical outcomes is to identify them, and these six prejudices are common even among the most well-intentioned physicians.